Platform changes impacting legacy Map Search function

Posted by AaronClausen

 27 Jul 2025

Hi NatureMaprs,

Since the early days, NatureMapr has provided a fully flexible, query driven "Map Search" function, which was previously accessible from the "Maps" dropdown menu from within a particular region.

Behind the scenes, this tool, despite its relatively simple appearance, was extremely complex to implement, maintain and support.

The tool was designed to operate within the bounds of NatureMapr's sensitive information handling framework i.e. displaying only the appropriate records to the appropriate people, as well as catering for an unlimited and unrestricted array of flexible query scenarios that thousands of users threw at it on a daily basis. The tool also generated a dynamic species list for all results displayed within the map.

As demand and load on the platform has grown and grown, the Map Search function in its existing form, has become completely unsustainable for NatureMapr to operate.

Beyond the ever-increasing infrastructure costs, this tool also generated a large user support footprint that our team simply aren't funded to support.

As we work to consolidate the community platform into a more sustainable long term position given reduced funding, the legacy Map Search tool has been decommissioned.

The ability to run powerful, open-ended queries against large data sets nationally is a service that national infrastructure providers like the Atlas of Living Australia are better placed to deliver.

We understand that there will be some disappointment within the community at this news.

Targeted Map Search for decision-maker backed programs

NatureMapr will roll out a streamlined and more targeted version of the Map Search function for place-based and species-based programs like NSW BCT Land Libraries, Glossies in the Mist, South East Orchids, Guardians of the Grassy Woodlands and Bats in Backyards.

These programs are decision-maker backed and have a defined scope and an allocated budget to deliver outcomes within that scope - a much more sustainable situation.

This new feature will allow project officers, contributors and landholders involved in these professional programs to interact with the records collected through their program using an interactive map, with results constrained to the scope of the program.

Cheers

Aaron.

9 comments

abread111 wrote:
   27 Jul 2025
Not being able to look at the distribution of a species on a map is a great pity, to say the least. Being forced to use ALA will take some getting used to.
waltraud wrote:
   28 Jul 2025
I agree with abread; the maps that showed distribution of species were a great asset. I wonder whether it could be reinstalled for the Canberra region where CNM began / or single places / maps?
trevorpreston wrote:
   28 Jul 2025
I miss this function as well, I found it really useful and used it frequently, however I understand that the google maps interaction was quite expensive.
trevorpreston wrote:
   28 Jul 2025
I wonder if the problem could be solved by having a link on CNM species pages to the corresponding ALA map or page?
RAllen wrote:
   Yesterday
Yes this a great loss. I would use this feature to track habitat for the newly discovered Paralucia crosbyi (Violet Copper Butterfly). With regard to ala there maps provide much poorer geographical features and are quite obscure. Paralucia crosbyi does not even feature on ala. Looking at maps for likely plant species was also something that I used frequently when surveying.
ConBoekel wrote:
   Yesterday
I can understand the financial constraints but this eliminates one of my main motivations and the main feedback as a contributor.
abread111 wrote:
   Yesterday
I also find this a constraint to my role as a location monitor. I have used the map search functions in many ways including in compiling the annual update to the Mount Majura / Mount Ainslie Flora listing, where there are boundary differences between Mt M and Mt A as defined in CNM and as they were historically defined in the original flora surveys. Without this type of search on CNM, I suspect we will be forced to amalgamate the Mt M and Mt A lists into one (which may not be a bad outcome).
I have also used the species maps to compile a list of rare and endangered species in the 60 Ha wider Fair area - this was included in The Fair Mount Majura Nature Reserve Weed Management Plan 2024-29 https://majura.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/The-Fair-Weed-Mangement-Plan-2024-29_final.pdf
Its fine to do the targeted version of map search for the Land Libraries etc, by don't forget moderators need to do targeted searches as well. And we don't get access to these Land Libraries etc ...
JaneR wrote:
   Yesterday
Me, too: I will really miss the Mapping function: I use it constantly (did use it constantly). its been useful in so many ways, showing species, checking accuracy of sightings, finding out what's in a reserve and where .
AlisonMilton wrote:
   Yesterday
I understand the constraints but this is a real set back. We have been using this to track the number of species in The Pinnacle Nature Reserve as I'm sure other Friends of reserves have been doing. Also been using it to track the number of species in my own backyard.

Please Login or Register to comment.

832,849 sightings of 22,932 species from 14,438 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
NatureMapr is developed by at3am IT Pty Ltd and is proudly Australian made